Herzog & de Meuron
Project
2005-2008

The museum board’s decision was clear: the new Parrish Museum was not to take the form of an extension of the existing building of 1897, but was to be designed as a new complex on a new and undeveloped site. This seemed to make the task all the more interesting for us, because it meant we could operate freely without having to take any existing structures into account. On the other hand, it is often the case that having to respect an existing structure actually sets the starting point for an architectural design. In this regard, the freedom of building from scratch is often a real challenge, rather than a constraint, for architects. Horror vacui – what is to be done with so much freedom? Now, although the undeveloped site on the outskirts of Southampton does offer just that kind of freedom, the more intensely we studied the history and collection of the Parrish Museum, the more strongly we tended towards the idea of a small-scale pavilion complex. Other architectural typologies soon began to look less promising.

Pavilion Complex

The pavilion is actually the ideal museum type. Even in the late 1970s, Rémy Zaugg enthused about the advantages of the single exhibition space, which he later described in his theoretical treatise “Das Museum, das ich mir erträume” [The museum I dream of]. Apart from the perceptual qualities Zaugg attributes to such fragmented sequences of spaces, we found other factors that spoke in favour of individual units rather than a single building: the setting, the urban and natural features, as well other aspects connected with the history of East End’s artistic community. In terms of architectural typology, the individual units of the pavilion complex relate to the small-scale structure of Southampton with its simple forms such as the barns and other farm buildings often used by artists as studios. The landscape and the unusual light of Long Island were major reasons for the formation of the artists’ community in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Because of this, it not only seemed logical to make an architectural and urban reference to the working conditions of the artists themselves, but it also seemed potentially highly interesting from a curatorial point of view. The main focus of the Parrish collection is on artists who have lived and worked here, just as Chuck Close, Barbara Kruger, Cindy Sherman, Barbara Bloom and Robert Gober still do. The museum has identified these four seminal artists, each of whose work will serve as a major focal point within the narrative of East End art from the 19th c. to the present: William Merritt Chase, Fairfield Porter, Willem de Kooning, Roy Lichtenstein. Their decision gave us an opportunity of developing the concept of Anchor Spaces. These Anchor Spaces are both architectural and curatorial highlights, defining the museum spatially and intellectually and providing an artificial topography for the orientation and enjoyment of visitors.

Anchor Spaces

The first time we specifically developed an Anchor Space of this kind was when we were commissioned by the MoMA in New York for the 2006 Artist’s Choice project. After that, we also developed specific variations on this concept for the Espacio Goya (2005/06) and the Tate Modern extension (2005/06). In all these projects, the Anchor Spaces proved to be a very fruitful strategy in terms of thinking “out of the box” and going beyond the usual architectural conventions to create a museum complex in dialogue with the curators and the artists. Here at the Parrish, the Anchor Galleries are the reconstruction of the basic architectural elements of the studios of William Merritt Chase, Fairfield Porter, Willem de Kooning and Roy Lichtenstein. However, they are not reconstructions in a simulated, Disneyworld sense, nor are they frozen in time like the Brancusi studio outside the Centre Pompidou in Paris. Instead, they emulate the artists’ studio spaces in terms of their proportions, dimensions and specific natural light conditions. While these studios will be used initially to present the works of the respective artists and the documentation pertaining to them, they will also be used as exhibition spaces for other purposes, thereby providing the curators with an interesting alternative to the White Cube.

Herzog & de Meuron, 2007
Translation by Ishbel Flett

277_CI_0703_010_DD_M-Render
277_CI_0703_010_DD_M-Render
277_CI_0701_001_DD07_P1
277_CI_0701_001_DD07_P1
277_MO_070921_021_Exterior
277_MO_070921_021_Exterior
277_MO_0604_013_rough-cut
277_MO_0604_013_rough-cut
277_CI_0703_012_DD_G-rend
277_CI_0703_012_DD_G-rend
277_CI_070517_003_Chase
277_CI_070517_003_Chase
277_CI_070427_001_Porter
277_CI_070427_001_Porter

Team

Facts

Client
Parrish Art Museum, Southampton, USA
Planning
This project was developed in collaboration with an architect licensed in the state of New York acting as the "Architect of Record". Herzog & de Meuron is not licensed to practice architecture in New York State.
Design Consultant: Herzog & de Meuron, Basel, Switzerland
Executive Architect: Handel Architects LLP, New York, USA
Landscape Executive Architect : Reed Hilderbrand Landscape Architecture, Watertown, USA
Project Management : F.J. Sciame Construction Co. Inc., New York, NY, USA
Structural Engineering: Buro Happold, New York, NY, USA
Electrical Engineering: Buro Happold, New York, NY, USA
Mechanical Engineering: Buro Happold, New York, NY, USA
Furniture Design: KGID, Konstantin Grcic Industrial Design, Munich, Germany
Specialist / Consulting
Facade Consulting: R.A. Heintges & Associates, New York, USA
Lighting Engineer: Arup Lighting, New York, USA / London, UK
Geotechnical Consultant:: Langan, New York, NY, USA
Acoustics: Shen Milsom Wilke, New York, USA
Fire Protection: Rolf Jensen & Associates, Inc., Chicago, USA
Concrete Consultant: Reginald D. Hough, Rhinebeck, USA
Climate Engineering: Transsolar Energietechnik GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany
Civil Engineering: Nelson & Pope Engineers & Surveyors, Melville, USA
Environmental Engineering: Nelson & Pope Engineers & Surveyors, Melville, USA
Security Consultant: Ducibella Venter & Santore, North Haven, CT, USA
Building Data
Site Area: 602'778 sqft, 56'000 sqm
Length: 449 ft, 137 m
Width: 249 ft, 76 m
Height: 36 ft, 11 m
Links
www.parrishart.org

Bibliography

“Herzog y de Meuron. Herzog & de Meuron. Museo de Arte Parrish.” “Parrish Art Museum, Southampton.”
In: Luis Fernández-Galiano (Ed.). “Arquitectura Viva Proyectos.” Vol. No. 25, Madrid, Arquitectura Viva, 2008. pp. 6-7.

Javier Montes: “Ampliación del Museo Parrish de Herzog & de Meuron.” In: Luis Fernández-Galiano (Ed.). “Arquitectura Viva.” Vol. No. 117, Madrid, Arquitectura Viva, 11.2007. p. 11.

“Building Review. Herzog & de Meuron.” Vol. No. 340, Beijing, Art and Design Publishing House, 03.2007. pp. 8-140.

Luis Fernández-Galiano (Ed.): “Arquitectura Viva. Herzog & de Meuron 1978-2007.” 2nd rev. ed. Madrid, Arquitectura Viva, 2007.